NAME
hub, hubfs, hubshell – persistent multiplexed i/o sessions, or 'screen without a screen'

SYNOPSIS
hub [ –b ] [ srvname ] [ hubgroup ]

hubshell attachstring

hubfs [ –Dasm ] srvname

DESCRIPTION
Hub invokes hubfs(1) to create a 9p filesystem of pipe–like Hubs available as a /srv and starts an rc(1) shell with its file descriptors redirected to these hubs, then uses hubshell(1) as a client for these connections. The overall usage model is somewhat similar to GNU screen but without the additional complexities of TTY management.

The base behavior of hub(1) srvname is bimodal, and will function as either a client or server depending on whether /srv/srvname exists. If no name is provided, hub will create or attach to a /srv named /srv/hubfs containing a persistent rc(1) session. Thus, the simplest possible model of use is:
hub

to start a backgrounded hubfs hosted persistent rc(1) shell, and then
hub

from any window with access to that /srv to connect to it. The –b flag to hub backgrounds the initially created rc(1) instead of attaching to it.

Hubfs can be used to provide general purpose pipes locally or across a network, with some special features. Most notably, echoing freeze to the ctl file will change the behavior of the hub files from pipe–like with blocking reads to simple static files that can be viewed and edited with normal tools. Writing melt to ctl will restore pipe–like behavior and resume the normal flow of data.

While connected via a hubshell input beginning with a %symbol will be checked for matching command strings. These commands are used to create new subshells within the hubfs session and move between them. A distinctive feature is the ability for remote clients to share a local shell with other clients of the hubfs. The %local NAME command does this. The more traditional mode of starting new shells on the remote host is done with the %remote NAME command. Note that 'remote' is the machine hosting the shell you are connected to currently. %detach terminates the hubshell and returns control to the user's original shell.

EXAMPLES
hub wrapper script:

start and connect to a new hubfs and post /srv/aug5
hub aug5

connects a new client to the rc shell started by the previous command

hub aug5

start and connects to new rc named rctwo within the aug5 hubfs

hub aug5 rctwo

Making new shells and moving in hubshell:

–all commands begin with '%' as first character–

%detach    # disconnect from attached shell

%remote NAME # start shell on remote machine

%local NAME # start shell on local machine shared to hubfs

%attach NAME # move to an existing hubfs shell

%err TIME, %in TIME, %out TIME # time in ms for delay loop

%status # basic hubfs connection info

%list # lc of connected hubfs hubs

%unecho # turn off echo flush when moving between shells

%fortun # turn on fortune flush when moving between shells

Controlling hubfs via the ctl file:

–reading from ctl file returns status–

echo freeze >/n/hubfs/ctl #freeze Hubs as static files

echo melt >/n/hubfs/ctl #resume normal flow of data

echo fear >/n/hubfs/ctl #activate paranoid(safe) mode
# – writers wait for readers

echo calm >/n/hubfs/ctl #resume non–paranoid mode

echo quit >/n/hubfs/ctl #kill the fs

SOURCE
/n/sources/contrib/mycroftiv/hubfs.tgz

SEE ALSO
UNIX pipes, pipe(3) , srv(3) and aux/consolefs(4)

BUGS
In the standard mode of use for interactive rc shells, the synchronization between stdout and stderr is not maintained. The symptom is prompts appearing in seemingly the wrong place. To fix this, enter a command like %err 300 to set 300 milliseconds of delay before data from stderr is printed.

Because hubfs maintains static buffers and always allows clients to write to avoid loss of interactivity, slow readers may experience data loss while reading output larger than the size of the static buffer if the output was also transmitted fast enough to "wrap around" the location of the reader in the data buffer. The purpose of "paranoid" mode is to restrict the speed of writers if this is a concern.

"Doug had for years and years, and he talked to us continually about it, a notion of interconnecting computers in grids, and arrays, very complex, and there were always problems in his proposals. That what you would type would be linear and what he wanted was three–dimensional, n–dimensional...I mean he wanted just topological connection of programs and to build programs with loops and and horrid things. He had such grandiose ideas and we were saying, the complexity you're generating just can't be fathomed. You don't sit down and you don't type these kind of connections together. And he persisted with the grandiose ideas where you get into Kirchoff's law problems...what happens if you have a feedback loop and every program doubles the number of characters, it reads one and writes two? It's got to go somewhere – synchronization – there's just no way to implement his ideas and we kept trying to pare him down and weed him down and get something useful and distill it. What was needed, was real ideas...and there were constant discussions all through this period, and it hit just one night, it just hit, and they went in instantly."

~Ken Thompson on UNIX pipes' origins

http://www.princeton.edu/~hos/mike/transcripts/thompson.htm